2016 D3US/x\M4CHIN4



The title is inspired by a term of the Greek tragedy and refers to an unexpected power that intervenes and saves a seemingly hopeless situation. Belfiore uses this notion to explore a poetic that can induce an experience of unimaginable changes. D3US/x\M4CHIN4 brings the notions of vulnerability, energy and motion to live through Gods and machines. The limits of theatricality stretch, plastic faces melt, different sources of sounds form a chorus and a supernatural battle becomes a starting point for a choreography that balances between the epic, science fiction and a ritual. As the machinery is set in motion, the stage becomes a place for the unknown and the reconfiguration of our imagination.

the problem is not how to reduce mind to neuronal “material” processes (to replace the language of mind by the language of brain processes, to translate the first one into the second one), but, rather, to grasp how mind can emerge only through being embedded in the network of social relations and material supplements. In other words, the true problem is not “How, if at all, could machines IMITATE the human mind?,” but, “How does the very identity of human mind rely on external mechanical supplements? How does it incorporate machines? Organs Without Bodies – Slavoj Zizeck – 


The performance will premiere on 30th September 2016. During Moving Futures Festival 2015, it will be shown a short version from November 2015 till February 2016. It is produced by Dansmakers Amsterdam with co-production of Work Space Brussels and supported by ICK Amsterdam, Young ArtFund Amsterdam, Dansgroep Amsterdam and Amsterdams Fonds voor de Kunst.



2018 Ballet OFF Festival – Nowohuckie Centrum Kultury – Krakow (PO)

2017 Frascati – Amsterdam  (NL)

2017 Frascati – Amsterdam  (NL)

2017 Flam Frascati – Amsterdam  (NL)

2017 Flora Theater Festival – Olomouc (CZ

2017 Flora Theater Festival – Olomouc (CZ

2016 DansmakersPodium (NL)

2016 Forum of Live Arts VI, Arti Gallery, Amsterdam (NL)

2016 Working Title Platform#4 – WSB (BE)

2015 Moving Futures Festival Amsterdam (NL)

2015 Theater aan de Rijn, Moving Futures Festival, Arnhem (NL)

2015 Theater Kikker, Utrecht  (NL)

2015 Schouwburg de Lawei, Drachten (NL)

2015 LUX Theater, Nijmegen (NL)

2015 WorkSpaceBrussels – Showing Studio ROSAS (BE)

Screen Shot 2015-10-31 at 02.56.51

Screen Shot 2015-10-31 at 02.41.12

Screen Shot 2015-10-31 at 02.52.18

Choreography and Direction Fernando Belfiore _ Creation and Performance Luna Eggers Matz, Rozemarijn de Neve, Maria Metsalu and Jija Sohn _ Dramaturgy Mirijana Smolic _ Light Wijnand Van der Horst _ Set Nikola Knežević _Sound Sne Martin Snider _Costume Luna Eggers Matz and Jeroen Zellenrath Research, Creation and past performances _ Goran Kusic _Research Process Eva Susova, Tomislav Feller, Jordan Iffenildo _ Outside Eye Riccardo Guratti, Renee Copraij and Vincent Riebeek _ Artistic Coach Suzy Blok _ Production Sanne Wichman| Dansmakers Amsterdam _ PR Lisette Brouwer, Lisa Reinheimer | Dansmakers Amsterdam with co-production of WorkSpaceBrussels and supported by ICK Amsterdam, Young ArtFund Amsterdam, Dansgroep Amsterdam and Amsterdams Fonds voor de Kunst.



Photo Bellow PaulMcGee


Dansmakers Podium – November – Alwin Poiana


Dionysus, also named the Black Sun, is the balance point of the Sun. It represents the unconscious part, the black hole, the area not yet awakened to Knowledge. It is seldom used and often contested… probably quite rightly. Its yearly motion is only of 1 degree and 52 minutes. Therefore, it is collective by nature. At the end of 2003, it was located at 13° Cancer. The place where it is posited in the natal chart indicates the field in which the individual significantly meets with communities.

Dansmakers Podium – Short Version –  Photo by Alwin Poiana






Alain Badiou: ‘People cling onto identities… it is a world opposed to the encounter’

I dream of a world where encounters are less coded by the social, professional, cultural and linguistic universes.

(…) the encounter is widening, because of our means of transport and communication. On the other hand, as always, this enlargement comes at the cost of a ‘loss of intensity’. Encounters are so easy and numerous that the intensity of the change that we could accept as a result is no longer the same as it once was. We introduce a set of precautions: I will take someone sufficiently similar to me that I can hope to go along with this person while myself remaining exactly the same. This is a tendency of the contemporary world, to introduce a false variety within a vast sameness. Improbability distinguishes it from an ordinary experience. When the encounter happens to you, when you have the very strong feeling that it is happening to you, there is a phenomenon of attraction or repulsion – sometimes the two are mixed – toward what has disturbed the rhythm of your existence. Experience, for its part, can perfectly well fit within your work or family activities, whereas the encounter is a beginning. But the beginning of what? It is at the point of acceptance: accepting or refusing what is happening to you. To take the example of an amorous encounter, the whole problem lies in knowing whether to declare it or not. People speak of a declaration of love. The encounter has to be declared, that is, accepted. 

Working Title Situation#4 WSB, 2016 Brussels – Paul McGee Photography

2016 06 04 WSB  3202016 06 04 WSB  296

2016 06 04 WSB  249


2016 06 04 WSB  266

“when they don’t know what to say

and have completely given up on the play

just like a finger they lift the machine

and the spectators are satisfied.” Antiphanes

Forum of Live Arts Amsterdam VI – Photo by Tomas Lenden Photography

FLAM VI | Forum for Live Art Amsterdam. Arti Et Amicitiae

FLAM VI | Forum for Live Art Amsterdam. Arti Et Amicitiae

FLAM VI | Forum for Live Art Amsterdam. Arti Et Amicitiae

FLAM VI | Forum for Live Art Amsterdam. Arti Et Amicitiae

FLAM VI | Forum for Live Art Amsterdam. Arti Et Amicitiae

FLAM VI | Forum for Live Art Amsterdam. Arti Et Amicitiae


Jeff Koons, New Hoover Celebrity IV, New Hoover Convertible, New Shelton 5 Gallon Wet/Dry, New Shelton 10 Gallon Wet/Dry Doubledecker (1981-86)

four vacuum cleaners, acrylic, fluorescent lights
99 x 53 1/2 x 28 inches
251.5 x 135.9 x 71.1 cm
© Jeff Koons


In The Threepenny Opera (1931), Bertolt Brecht uses a machina to emphasize the discomforting artificiality of fictive resolution. The idea—that a deus ex machina can be subversive, undercutting generic conventions and challenging cultural assumptions—is also applicable to a great deal of Chartist and working-class fiction. From Chartist stories in the 1840s to Robert Tressell’s The Ragged Trousered Philanthropists (1914), melodramatic aspects of plotting often include deus ex machina devices. Ian Haywood has argued that melodrama is implicitly democratic, and that in “the light of this… understanding, it would be wrong to judge melodrama as an early form of debased mass culture providing mythical resolutions to historical conflicts” (“Editor’s Introduction,” Woman’s xx). In much melodrama and working-class fiction, the deus ex machina constitutes a highly interesting “ideologeme,” to use Fredric Jameson’s term for “the smallest intelligible unit of the essentially antagonistic collective discourses of social classes” Rob Breton


laboriacuboniks.net | @Xenofeminism

Laboria Cuboniks


Ours is a world in vertigo. It is a world that swarms with technological

mediation, interlacing our daily lives with abstraction, virtuality, and complexity.

XF constructs a feminism adapted to these realities: a feminism of

unprecedented cunning, scale, and vision; a future in which the realization

of gender justice and feminist emancipation contribute to a universalist

politics assembled from the needs of every human, cutting across race,

ability, economic standing, and geographical position. No more futureless

repetition on the treadmill of capital, no more submission to the drudgery

of labour, productive and reproductive alike, no more reification of the given

masked as critique. Our future requires depetrification. XF is not a bid for

revolution, but a wager on the long game of history, demanding imagination,

dexterity and persistence.

XF seizes alienation as an impetus to generate new worlds. We are all alienated

– but have we ever been otherwise? It is through, and not despite,

our alienated condition that we can free ourselves from the muck of immediacy.

Freedom is not a given—and it’s certainly not given by anything

‘natural’. The construction of freedom involves not less but more alienation;

alienation is the labour of freedom’s construction. Nothing should be accepted

as fixed, permanent, or ‘given’—neither material conditions nor social

forms. XF mutates, navigates and probes every horizon. Anyone who’s

been deemed ‘unnatural’ in the face of reigning biological norms, anyone

who’s experienced injustices wrought in the name of natural order, will realize

that the glorification of ‘nature’ has nothing to offer us—the queer and

trans among us, the differently-abled, as well as those who have suffered

discrimination due to pregnancy or duties connected to child-rearing. XF is

vehemently anti-naturalist. Essentialist naturalism reeks of theology—the

sooner it is exorcised, the better.



2Xenofeminism: A Politics for Alienation

Why is there so little explicit, organized effort to repurpose technologies for

progressive gender political ends? XF seeks to strategically deploy existing

technologies to re-engineer the world. Serious risks are built into these

tools; they are prone to imbalance, abuse, and exploitation of the weak.

Rather than pretending to risk nothing, XF advocates the necessary assembly

of techno-political interfaces responsive to these risks. Technology

isn’t inherently progressive. Its uses are fused with culture in a positive

feedback loop that makes linear sequencing, prediction, and absolute caution

impossible. Technoscientific innovation must be linked to a collective

theoretical and political thinking in which women, queers, and the gender

non-conforming play an unparalleled role.

The real emancipatory potential of technology remains unrealized. Fed by

the market, its rapid growth is offset by bloat, and elegant innovation is

surrendered to the buyer, whose stagnant world it decorates. Beyond the

noisy clutter of commodified cruft, the ultimate task lies in engineering

technologies to combat unequal access to reproductive and pharmacological

tools, environmental cataclysm, economic instability, as well as dangerous

forms of unpaid/underpaid labour. Gender inequality still characterizes

the fields in which our technologies are conceived, built, and legislated for,

while female workers in electronics (to name just one industry) perform

some of the worst paid, monotonous and debilitating labour. Such injustice

demands structural, machinic and ideological correction.

Xenofeminism is a rationalism. To claim that reason or rationality is ‘by

nature’ a patriarchal enterprise is to concede defeat. It is true that the

canonical ‘history of thought’ is dominated by men, and it is male hands

we see throttling existing institutions of science and technology. But this is

precisely why feminism must be a rationalism—because of this miserable

imbalance, and not despite it. There is no ‘feminine’ rationality, nor is there

a ‘masculine’ one. Science is not an expression but a suspension of gender.

If today it is dominated by masculine egos, then it is at odds with itself—

and this contradiction can be leveraged. Reason, like information, wants to

be free, and patriarchy cannot give it freedom. Rationalism must itself be

a feminism. XF marks the point where these claims intersect in a two-way

dependency. It names reason as an engine of feminist emancipation, and

declares the right of everyone to speak as no one in particular.




3Xenofeminism: A Politics for Alienation


The excess of modesty in feminist agendas of recent decades is not

proportionate to the monstrous complexity of our reality, a reality crosshatched

with fibre-optic cables, radio and microwaves, oil and gas pipelines,

aerial and shipping routes, and the unrelenting, simultaneous execution

of millions of communication protocols with every passing millisecond.

Systematic thinking and structural analysis have largely fallen by the

wayside in favour of admirable, but insufficient struggles, bound to fixed

localities and fragmented insurrections. Whilst capitalism is understood

as a complex and ever-expanding totality, many would-be emancipatory

anti-capitalist projects remain profoundly fearful of transitioning to the

universal, resisting big-picture speculative politics by condemning them as

necessarily oppressive vectors. Such a false guarantee treats universals as

absolute, generating a debilitating disjuncture between the thing we seek

to depose and the strategies we advance to depose it.

Global complexity opens us to urgent cognitive and ethical demands. These

are Promethean responsibilities that cannot pass unaddressed. Much of

twenty-first century feminism—from the remnants of postmodern identity

politics to large swathes of contemporary ecofeminism—struggles to

adequately address these challenges in a manner capable of producing

substantial and enduring change. Xenofeminism endeavours to face up

to these obligations as collective agents capable of transitioning between

multiple levels of political, material and conceptual organization.

We are adamantly synthetic, unsatisfied by analysis alone. XF urges constructive

oscillation between description and prescription to mobilize the

recursive potential of contemporary technologies upon gender, sexuality

and disparities of power. Given that there are a range of gendered challenges

specifically relating to life in a digital age—from sexual harassment

via social media, to doxxing, privacy, and the protection of online images—the

situation requires a feminism at ease with computation. Today, it

is imperative that we develop an ideological infrastructure that both supports

and facilitates feminist interventions within connective, networked

elements of the contemporary world. Xenofeminism is about more than

digital self-defence and freedom from patriarchal networks. We want to

cultivate the exercise of positive freedom—freedom-to rather than simply

freedom-from—and urge feminists to equip themselves with the skills to

redeploy existing technologies and invent novel cognitive and material tools

in the service of common ends.

The radical opportunities afforded by developing (and alienating) forms

of technological mediation should no longer be put to use in the exclusive

interests of capital, which, by design, only benefits the few. 0x05




4Xenofeminism: A Politics for Alienation

There are incessantly proliferating tools to be annexed, and although no one can

claim their comprehensive accessibility, digital tools have never been more

widely available or more sensitive to appropriation than they are today.

This is not an elision of the fact that a large amount of the world’s poor is

adversely affected by the expanding technological industry (from factory

workers labouring under abominable conditions to the Ghanaian villages

that have become a repository for the e-waste of the global powers) but

an explicit acknowledgement of these conditions as a target for elimination.

Just as the invention of the stock market was also the invention of

the crash, Xenofeminism knows that technological innovation must equally

anticipate its systemic condition responsively.


XF rejects illusion and melancholy as political inhibitors. Illusion, as the blind

presumption that the weak can prevail over the strong with no strategic

coordination, leads to unfulfilled promises and unmarshalled drives. This is

a politics that, in wanting so much, ends up building so little. Without the

labour of large-scale, collective social organisation, declaring one’s desire

for global change is nothing more than wishful thinking. On the other hand,

melancholy—so endemic to the left—teaches us that emancipation is an

extinct species to be wept over and that blips of negation are the best we

can hope for. At its worst, such an attitude generates nothing but political

lassitude, and at its best, installs an atmosphere of pervasive despair which

too often degenerates into factionalism and petty moralizing. The malady

of melancholia only compounds political inertia, and—under the guise of

being realistic—relinquishes all hope of calibrating the world otherwise. It

is against such maladies that XF innoculates.

We take politics that exclusively valorize the local in the guise of subverting

currents of global abstraction, to be insufficient. To secede from or disavow

capitalist machinery will not make it disappear. Likewise, suggestions

to pull the lever on the emergency brake of embedded velocities, the call

to slow down and scale back, is a possibility available only to the few—a

violent particularity of exclusivity—ultimately entailing catastrophe for the

many. Refusing to think beyond the microcommunity, to foster connections

between fractured insurgencies, to consider how emancipatory tactics can

be scaled up for universal implementation, is to remain satisfied with temporary

and defensive gestures. XF is an affirmative creature on the offensive,

fiercely insisting on the possibility of large-scale social change for all of

our alien kin.




5Xenofeminism: A Politics for Alienation

A sense of the world’s volatility and artificiality seems to have faded from

contemporary queer and feminist politics, in favour of a plural but static

constellation of gender identities, in whose bleak light equations of the

good and the natural are stubbornly restored. While having (perhaps)

admirably expanded thresholds of ‘tolerance’, too often we are told to seek

solace in unfreedom, staking claims on being ‘born’ this way, as if offering

an excuse with nature’s blessing. All the while, the heteronormative centre

chugs on. XF challenges this centrifugal referent, knowing full well that sex

and gender are exemplary of the fulcrum between norm and fact, between

freedom and compulsion. To tilt the fulcrum in the direction of nature is a

defensive concession at best, and a retreat from what makes trans and

queer politics more than just a lobby: that it is an arduous assertion of

freedom against an order that seemed immutable. Like every myth of the

given, a stable foundation is fabulated for a real world of chaos, violence,

and doubt. The ‘given’ is sequestered into the private realm as a certainty,

whilst retreating on fronts of public consequences. When the possibility of

transition became real and known, the tomb under Nature’s shrine cracked,

and new histories—bristling with futures—escaped the old order of ‘sex’.

The disciplinary grid of gender is in no small part an attempt to mend that

shattered foundation, and tame the lives that escaped it. The time has now

come to tear down this shrine entirely, and not bow down before it in a

piteous apology for what little autonomy has been won.

If ‘cyberspace’ once offered the promise of escaping the strictures of

essentialist identity categories, the climate of contemporary social media

has swung forcefully in the other direction, and has become a theatre

where these prostrations to identity are performed. With these curatorial

practices come puritanical rituals of moral maintenance, and these stages

are too often overrun with the disavowed pleasures of accusation, shaming,

and denunciation. Valuable platforms for connection, organization, and

skill-sharing become clogged with obstacles to productive debate positioned

as if they are debate. These puritanical politics of shame—which fetishize

oppression as if it were a blessing, and cloud the waters in moralistic

frenzies—leave us cold. We want neither clean hands nor beautiful souls,

neither virtue nor terror. We want superior forms of corruption.

What this shows is that the task of engineering platforms for social

emancipation and organization cannot ignore the cultural and semiotic

mutations these platforms afford. What requires reengineering are the

memetic parasites arousing and coordinating behaviours in ways occluded

by their hosts’ self-image; failing this, memes like ‘anonymity’, ‘ethics’,

‘social justice’ and ‘privilege-checking’ host social dynamisms at odds with

the often-commendable intentions with which they’re taken up. The task

of collective self-mastery requires a hyperstitional manipulation of desire’s

puppet-strings, and deployment of semiotic operators over a terrain of

highly networked cultural systems. The will will always be corrupted by the

memes in which it traffics, but nothing prevents us from instrumentalizing

this fact, and calibrating it in view of the ends it desires.



6Xenofeminism: A Politics for Alienation


Xenofeminism is gender-abolitionist. ‘Gender abolitionism’ is not code for

the eradication of what are currently considered ‘gendered’ traits from the

human population. Under patriarchy, such a project could only spell disaster—the

notion of what is ‘gendered’ sticks disproportionately to the feminine.

But even if this balance were redressed, we have no interest in seeing

the sexuate diversity of the world reduced. Let a hundred sexes bloom!

‘Gender abolitionism’ is shorthand for the ambition to construct a society

where traits currently assembled under the rubric of gender, no longer

furnish a grid for the asymmetric operation of power. ‘Race abolitionism

expands into a similar formula—that the struggle must continue until currently

racialized characteristics are no more a basis of discrimination than

than the color of one’s eyes. Ultimately, every emancipatory abolitionism

must incline towards the horizon of class abolitionism, since it is in capitalism

where we encounter oppression in its transparent, denaturalized form:

you’re not exploited or oppressed because you are a wage labourer or poor;

you are a labourer or poor because you are exploited.

Xenofeminism understands that the viability of emancipatory abolitionist

projects—the abolition of class, gender, and race—hinges on a profound

reworking of the universal. The universal must be grasped as generic,

which is to say, intersectional. Intersectionality is not the morcellation of

collectives into a static fuzz of cross-referenced identities, but a political

orientation that slices through every particular, refusing the crass pigeonholing

of bodies. This is not a universal that can be imposed from above,

but built from the bottom up – or, better, laterally, opening new lines of

transit across an uneven landscape. This non-absolute, generic universality

must guard against the facile tendency of conflation with bloated, unmarked

particulars—namely Eurocentric universalism—whereby the male

is mistaken for the sexless, the white for raceless, the cis for the real, and

so on. Absent such a universal, the abolition of class will remain a bourgeois

fantasy, the abolition of race will remain a tacit white-supremacism, and the

abolition of gender will remain a thinly veiled misogyny, even—especially—

when prosecuted by avowed feminists themselves. (The absurd and reckless

spectacle of so many self-proclaimed ‘gender abolitionists’’ campaign

against trans women is proof enough of this).

From the postmoderns, we have learnt to burn the facades of the false

universal and dispel such confusions; from the moderns, we have learnt

to sift new universals from the ashes of the false. Xenofeminism seeks

to construct a coalitional politics, a politics without the infection of purity.

Wielding the universal requires thoughtful qualification and precise selfreflection

so as to become a ready-to-hand tool for multiple political bodies

and something that can be appropriated against the numerous oppressions




7Xenofeminism: A Politics for Alienation

that transect with gender and sexuality. The universal is no blueprint, and

rather than dictate its uses in advance, we propose XF as a platform. The

very process of construction is therefore understood to be a negentropic,

iterative, and continual refashioning. Xenofeminism seeks to be a mutable

architecture that, like open source software, remains available for perpetual

modification and enhancement following the navigational impulse of

militant ethical reasoning. Open, however, does not mean undirected. The

most durable systems in the world owe their stability to the way they train

order to emerge as an ‘invisible hand’ from apparent spontaneity; or exploit

the inertia of investment and sedimentation. We should not hesitate

to learn from our adversaries or the successes and failures of history. With

this in mind, XF seeks ways to seed an order that is equitable and just,

injecting it into the geometry of freedoms these platforms afford.


Our lot is cast with technoscience, where nothing is so sacred that it

cannot be reengineered and transformed so as to widen our aperture of

freedom, extending to gender and the human. To say that nothing is sacred,

that nothing is transcendent or protected from the will to know,

to tinker and to hack, is to say that nothing is supernatural. ‘Nature’—

understood here, as the unbounded arena of science—is all there is.

And so, in tearing down melancholy and illusion; the unambitious and the

non-scaleable; the libidinized puritanism of certain online cultures, and

Nature as an un-remakeable given, we find that our normative anti-naturalism

has pushed us towards an unflinching ontological naturalism. There

is nothing, we claim, that cannot be studied scientifically and manipulated


This does not mean that the distinction between the ontological and the

normative, between fact and value, is simply cut and dried. The vectors of

normative anti-naturalism and ontological naturalism span many ambivalent

battlefields. The project of untangling what ought to be from what is, of

dissociating freedom from fact, will from knowledge, is, indeed, an infinite

task. There are many lacunae where desire confronts us with the brutality

of fact, where beauty is indissociable from truth. Poetry, sex, technology

and pain are incandescent with this tension we have traced. But give up on

the task of revision, release the reins and slacken that tension, and these

filaments instantly dim.



8Xenofeminism: A Politics for Alienation


The potential of early, text-based internet culture for countering repressive

gender regimes, generating solidarity among marginalised groups, and

creating new spaces for experimentation that ignited cyberfeminism in

the nineties has clearly waned in the twenty-first century. The dominance

of the visual in today’s online interfaces has reinstated familiar modes of

identity policing, power relations and gender norms in self-representation.

But this does not mean that cyberfeminist sensibilities belong to the past.

Sorting the subversive possibilities from the oppressive ones latent in today’s

web requires a feminism sensitive to the insidious return of old power

structures, yet savvy enough to know how to exploit the potential. Digital

technologies are not separable from the material realities that underwrite

them; they are connected so that each can be used to alter the other

towards different ends. Rather than arguing for the primacy of the virtual

over the material, or the material over the virtual, xenofeminism grasps

points of power and powerlessness in both, to unfold this knowledge as

effective interventions in our jointly composed reality.

Intervention in more obviously material hegemonies is just as crucial as

intervention in digital and cultural ones. Changes to the built environment

harbour some of the most significant possibilities in the reconfiguration

of the horizons of women and queers. As the embodiment of ideological

constellations, the production of space and the decisions we make for its

organization are ultimately articulations about ‘us’ and reciprocally, how a

‘we’ can be articulated. With the potential to foreclose, restrict, or open up

future social conditions, xenofeminists must become attuned to the language

of architecture as a vocabulary for collective choreo-graphy—the

coordinated writing of space.

From the street to the home, domestic space too must not escape our

tentacles. So profoundly ingrained, domestic space has been deemed

impossible to disembed, where the home as norm has been conflated with

home as fact, as an un-remakeable given. Stultifying ‘domestic realism’ has

no home on our horizon. Let us set sights on augmented homes of shared

laboratories, of communal media and technical facilities. The home is ripe

for spatial transformation as an integral component in any process of feminist

futurity. But this cannot stop at the garden gates. We see too well that

reinventions of family structure and domestic life are currently only possible

at the cost of either withdrawing from the economic sphere—the way of

the commune—or bearing its burdens manyfold—the way of the single

parent. If we want to break the inertia that has kept the moribund figure

of the nuclear family unit in place, which has stubbornly worked to isolate

women from the public sphere, and men from the lives of their children,

while penalizing those who stray from it, we must overhaul the material




9Xenofeminism: A Politics for Alienation

infrastructure and break the economic cycles that lock it in place. The task

before us is twofold, and our vision necessarily stereoscopic: we must engineer

an economy that liberates reproductive labour and family life, while

building models of familiality free from the deadening grind of wage labour.

From the home to the body, the articulation of a proactive politics for

biotechnical intervention and hormones presses. Hormones hack into

gender systems possessing political scope extending beyond the aesthetic

calibration of individual bodies. Thought structurally, the distribution of

hormones—who or what this distribution prioritizes or pathologizes—is

of paramount import. The rise of the internet and the hydra of black market

pharmacies it let loose—together with a publicly accessible archive of

endocrinological knowhow—was instrumental in wresting control of the

hormonal economy away from ‘gatekeeping’ institutions seeking to mitigate

threats to established distributions of the sexual. To trade in the rule of

bureaucrats for the market is, however, not a victory in itself. These tides

need to rise higher. We ask whether the idiom of ‘gender hacking’ is extensible

into a long-range strategy, a strategy for wetware akin to what hacker

culture has already done for software—constructing an entire universe of

free and open source platforms that is the closest thing to a practicable

communism many of us have ever seen. Without the foolhardy endangerment

of lives, can we stitch together the embryonic promises held before

us by pharmaceutical 3D printing (‘Reactionware’), grassroots telemedical

abortion clinics, gender hacktivist and DIY-HRT forums, and so on, to assemble

a platform for free and open source medicine?

From the global to the local, from the cloud to our bodies, xenofeminism

avows the responsibility in constructing new institutions of technomaterialist

hegemonic proportions. Like engineers who must conceive of a total

structure as well as the molecular parts from which it is constructed, XF

emphasises the importance of the mesopolitical sphere against the limited

effectiveness of local gestures, creation of autonomous zones, and sheer

horizontalism, just as it stands against transcendent, or top-down impositions

of values and norms. The mesopolitical arena of xenofeminism’s universalist

ambitions comprehends itself as a mobile and intricate network of

transits between these polarities. As pragmatists, we invite contamination

as a mutational driver between such frontiers.


XF asserts that adapting our behaviour for an era of Promethean complexity

is a labour requiring patience, but a ferocious patience at odds

with ‘waiting’. Calibrating a political hegemony or insurgent memeplex not

only implies the creation of material infra-structures to make the values it




10Xenofeminism: A Politics for Alienation

articulates explicit, but places demands on us as subjects. How are we to

become hosts of this new world? How do we build a better semiotic parasite—one

that arouses the desires we want to desire, that orchestrates not

an autophagic orgy of indignity or rage, but an emancipatory and egalitarian

community buttressed by new forms of unselfish solidarity and collective


Is xenofeminism a programme? Not if this means anything so crude as a

recipe, or a single-purpose tool by which a determinate problem is solved.

We prefer to think like the schemer or lisper, who seeks to construct a

new language in which the problem at hand is immersed, so that solutions

for it, and for any number of related problems, might unfurl with

ease. Xenofeminism is a platform, an incipient ambition to construct a new

language for sexual politics—a language that seizes its own methods as

materials to be reworked, and incrementally bootstraps itself into existence.

We understand that the problems we face are systemic and interlocking,

and that any chance of global success depends on infecting myriad skills

and contexts with the logic of XF. Ours is a transformation of seeping,

directed subsumption rather than rapid overthrow; it is a transformation of

deliberate construction, seeking to submerge the white-supremacist capitalist

patriarchy in a sea of procedures that soften its shell and dismantle its

defenses, so as to build a new world from the scraps.

Xenofeminism indexes the desire to construct an alien future with a triumphant

X on a mobile map. This X does not mark a destination. It is the

insertion of a topological-keyframe for the formation of a new logic. In

affirming a future untethered to the repetition of the present, we militate

for ampliative capacities, for spaces of freedom with a richer geometry

than the aisle, the assembly line, and the feed. We need new affordances

of perception and action unblinkered by naturalised identities. In the name

of feminism, ‘Nature’ shall no longer be a refuge of injustice, or a basis for

any political justification whatsoever!

If nature is unjust, change nature!


Photos bellow by Robert Siwek


Photos Bellow By Andrzej janikowski



Photos Bellow by K Machniewicz